Ortega v. People of the State of California

Filing 29

ORDER Re 28 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying Petitioner's 25 Motion for an Order Granting Him Access to The Law Library, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/11/12. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 MARK CURTIS ORTEGA, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 MARTIN BITER, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12-cv—00070-AWI-SKO-HC ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 28) ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING HIM ACCESS TO THE LAW LIBRARY (DOC. 25) 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a 18 petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-303. 21 On November 1, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 22 recommendations that Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief 23 be denied. 24 of objections within thirty days and a reply within fourteen days 25 thereafter. 26 parties on the same date. 27 28 The findings and recommendations permitted the filing The findings and recommendations were served on all Although the time for filing objections has passed, no objections have been filed. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 2 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. 3 The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file and finds 4 that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record 5 and proper analysis. 6 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for 7 injunctive relief is DENIED. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: 0m8i78 December 11, 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?