Brown v. Allison et al

Filing 9

FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal Of Action, Without Prejudice, For Failure To Either Pay Filing Fee Or Submit An Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docs. 3 , 5 ), Objections Due Within Fifteen Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 5/4/2012. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 5/22/2012. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DONALD C. BROWN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 K. ALLISON, et al., 13 CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00109-LJO-GBC (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO EITHER PAY FILING FEE OR SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. Docs. 3, 5 14 / OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS 15 16 Findings and Recommendations 17 18 19 On January 26, 2012, Plaintiff Donald C. Brown (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. 20 On January 30, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma 21 pauperis or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. Doc. 3. On March 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed a 22 motion for forty-five (45) day extension of time to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 23 Doc. 4. On March 6, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for forty-five (45) day extension of 24 time to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 5. In the January 30, 2012 and March 25 6, 2012 orders, the Court placed Plaintiff on notice that failure to submit an application to proceed 26 in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee would result in dismissal. Docs. 3, 5. To date, Plaintiff has 27 failed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full, submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or 28 respond to the Court’s orders. Page 1 of 2 1 A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or an application 2 to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff has not submitted an 3 application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or responded to the Court’s order to do 4 so, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability 5 Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110. 6 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, without 7 prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma 8 pauperis. 9 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 10 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fifteen (15) days 11 after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections 12 with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 13 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may 14 waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th 15 Cir. 1991). 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: 7j8cce May 4, 2012 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?