Brown v. Allison et al
Filing
9
FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal Of Action, Without Prejudice, For Failure To Either Pay Filing Fee Or Submit An Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docs. 3 , 5 ), Objections Due Within Fifteen Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 5/4/2012. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 5/22/2012. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DONALD C. BROWN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
K. ALLISON, et al.,
13
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00109-LJO-GBC (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO
EITHER PAY FILING FEE OR SUBMIT AN
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
Defendants.
Docs. 3, 5
14
/ OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS
15
16
Findings and Recommendations
17
18
19
On January 26, 2012, Plaintiff Donald C. Brown (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se,
filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1.
20
On January 30, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma
21
pauperis or pay the filing fee within forty-five days. Doc. 3. On March 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed a
22
motion for forty-five (45) day extension of time to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
23
Doc. 4. On March 6, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for forty-five (45) day extension of
24
time to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 5. In the January 30, 2012 and March
25
6, 2012 orders, the Court placed Plaintiff on notice that failure to submit an application to proceed
26
in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee would result in dismissal. Docs. 3, 5. To date, Plaintiff has
27
failed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full, submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or
28
respond to the Court’s orders.
Page 1 of 2
1
A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or an application
2
to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff has not submitted an
3
application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or responded to the Court’s order to do
4
so, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability
5
Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110.
6
Accordingly, the Court HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, without
7
prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma
8
pauperis.
9
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
10
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fifteen (15) days
11
after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections
12
with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
13
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may
14
waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th
15
Cir. 1991).
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated:
7j8cce
May 4, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?