Baker v. Yates
Filing
118
ORDER Setting Scheduling Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/18/2016. Scheduling Hearing set for 11/2/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
HARVEY CURTIS BAKER,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-SAB (PC)
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING
HEARING ON NOVEMBER 2, 2016 AT
10:00 A.M.
v.
S. MOORE,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff Harvey Curtis Baker is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to
19 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the
21 United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 115, 116.) On October 17, 2016, the Court assigned
22 this action to the undersigned for all further proceedings in this case, including the trial and entry
23 of final judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
24
On September 16, 2016, the Court denied Defendant S. Moore’s motion for summary
25 judgment. (ECF No. 112.) This action is now proceeding against Defendant S. Moore for
26 failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The case is ready to be scheduled for a
27 jury trial before the undersigned. In the interest of accommodating the parties’ schedules, the
28 Court will hold a hearing for scheduling purposes.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
A scheduling hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2016, at 10:00
a.m., in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned; and
3
2.
4
The parties may appear telephonically at the November 2, 2016 hearing by
5
contacting Courtroom Deputy Mamie Hernandez at 559-499-5672 prior to the
6
hearing to obtain the teleconference number and passcode.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
October 18, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?