Baker v. Yates

Filing 118

ORDER Setting Scheduling Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/18/2016. Scheduling Hearing set for 11/2/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 HARVEY CURTIS BAKER, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-SAB (PC) ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING HEARING ON NOVEMBER 2, 2016 AT 10:00 A.M. v. S. MOORE, Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Harvey Curtis Baker is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the 21 United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF Nos. 115, 116.) On October 17, 2016, the Court assigned 22 this action to the undersigned for all further proceedings in this case, including the trial and entry 23 of final judgment, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 24 On September 16, 2016, the Court denied Defendant S. Moore’s motion for summary 25 judgment. (ECF No. 112.) This action is now proceeding against Defendant S. Moore for 26 failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The case is ready to be scheduled for a 27 jury trial before the undersigned. In the interest of accommodating the parties’ schedules, the 28 Court will hold a hearing for scheduling purposes. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. A scheduling hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 9 before the undersigned; and 3 2. 4 The parties may appear telephonically at the November 2, 2016 hearing by 5 contacting Courtroom Deputy Mamie Hernandez at 559-499-5672 prior to the 6 hearing to obtain the teleconference number and passcode. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: October 18, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?