Baker v. Yates

Filing 23

ORDER re: Defendant's request for extension of time to reply to Plaintiff's untimely opposition to 8 Motion to Dismiss and for ORDER VACATING Hearing date, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/6/2012. (Kusamura, W) Modified on 6/7/2012 (Kusamura, W).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
HARVEY CURTIS BAKER,

Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-LJO-DLB

v.

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY
TO PLAINTIFF’S UNTIMELY
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
AND FOR ORDER VACATING HEARING
DATE

12
13
14
15

YATES, et al.,

16

Defendants. (Doc. 22).

17
18

Defendant Yates has applied for an extension of time to reply to Plaintiff’s untimely

19

opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss and to vacate the hearing on said motion. Good

20

cause appearing,

21

IT IS ORDERED that the time in which Defendant may reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to

22

motion to dismiss is extended to June 25, 2012. The hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss is

23

vacated. Local Rule 230(l). The Court will deem the matter submitted on the record without oral

24

argument after Defendant files his reply.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

Dated:

28

/s/ Dennis

June 6, 2012

L. Beck

DEAC_Signature-END:

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
[Proposed] Order (1:12-cv-00126-LJO-DLB)

1
2

3b142a

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order (1:12-cv-00126-LJO-DLB)