Baker v. Yates
Filing
43
ORDER Re Plaintiff's Filing (ECF No. 34 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 2/11/2013. Plaintiff's request/motion is DENIED. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARVEY CURTIS BAKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-LJO-SAB
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING
(ECF NO. 34)
JAMES A. YATES,
15
Defendant.
16
17
On November 21, 2012, Plaintiff Harvey Curtis Baker (“Plaintiff”) filed a correspondence
18
with this Court. (ECF No. 34.) It is unclear what Plaintiff’s filing requests, if anything, or if it
19
was even intended for the Court. The filing does not have a caption, and is addressed to
20
“Program Administrator.” Plaintiff asks the “Program Administrator” for information regarding
21
the Voluntary Dispute Resolution program.
22
Plaintiff is advised that the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program is a program available
23
in cases where all parties agree to submit their case for alternative dispute resolution, such as
24
mediation, negotiation or other forms of settlement facilitation. The Court will not submit this
25
case to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program unless all parties inform the Court that they
26
wish to participate. If the parties wish to refer this action to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution
27
Program, they must submit a stipulation signed by all parties.
28
///
1
Accordingly, to the extent that Plaintiff’s filing can be construed as a request or a motion,
1
2
it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request/motion is DENIED.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
February 11, 2013
_
DEAC_Signature-END:
8
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
i1eed4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?