Baker v. Yates
Filing
58
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 53 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/15/2013. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARVEY CURTIS BAKER,
12
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:12-cv-00126-LJO-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
ECF NO. 53
14
15
JAMES A. YATES,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Harvey Curtis Baker (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceedings pro se in this
18
civil rights action against Defendant James A. Yates (“Defendant”). On April 2, 2013, Defendant
19
filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 53.) On April 10, 2013, the magistrate judge issued a
20
Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied as
21
moot. (ECF No. 55.)
22
The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that
23
any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Neither party has filed objections to the
24
Findings and Recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a
26
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
27
Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. In this case,
28
Defendant’s motion to dismiss was mooted by the Court’s screening order dismissing Plaintiff’s
1
1
complaint. (See ECF No. 54.)
2
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
The Findings and Recommendations dated April 10, 2013 are ADOPTED IN
4
5
FULL (ECF No. 55); and
Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
2.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
May 15, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
DEAC_Signature-END:
66h44d
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?