Moore v. Cisneros et al

Filing 22

AMENDED ORDER After Settlement, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/5/2012. (Parties to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action as to Mr. Serrano, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed as to Mr. Serrano by 10/1/2012. Plaintiff to file papers to seek default judgment against Mr. Cisneros or to dismiss or conclude this action as to Mr. Cisneros by 10/1/2012.) (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RONALD MOORE,

8

CASE NO. CV F 12-0188 LJO SKO
Plaintiff,

9

AMENDED ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 21.)

vs.

10

JUAN CISNEROS, et al.,

11

Defendants.
____________________________/

12
13

Plaintiff’s counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached with defendant Hector M.

14

Serraon dba Serrano Chipolte Mexican Restaurant (“Mr. Serrano”). Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule

15

160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than October 1, 2012, to file appropriate papers to

16

dismiss or conclude this action as to Mr. Serrano, or to show good cause why the action has not been

17

dismissed as to Mr. Serrano.

18

Given the May 18, 2012 entry of default as to defendant Juan Cisneros (“Mr. Cisneros”), this

19

Court ORDERS plaintiff, no later than October 1, 2012, to file papers to seek default judgment against

20

Mr. Cisneros or to dismiss or conclude this action as to Mr. Cisneros.

21

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or

22

parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272.

23

ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil

24

Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems

25

appropriate.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d

September 5, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court