John Stewart v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Filing 47

ORDER regarding the joint scheduling report regarding discovery meet and confer; order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/9/2012. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
4 GIRARDI  KEESE John A. Girardi (SBN 54917) jgirardi@girardikeese.com 1126 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017 Tel: (213) 977-0211 Fax: (213) 481-1554 5 Counsel for Plaintiff JOHN STEWART 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 Rebecca A. Womeldorf (admitted pro hac vice) (rwomeldorf@hollingsworthllp.com) HOLLINGSWORTH LLP 1350 I Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 898-5800 Facsimile: (202) 682-1639 10 11 12 13 14 James A. Bruen (State Bar No. 43880) (jbruen@fbm.com) Sandra A. Edwards (State Bar No. 154578) (sedwards@fbm.com) FARELLA BRAUN & MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 JOHN STEWART, CASE NO: 1:12-cv-00221-AWI-DLB 21 Plaintiff, 22 vs. 23 24 25 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER REGARDING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT REGARDING DISCOVERY MEET AND CONFER Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: August 22, 2012 9:30 a.m. 9 The Hon. Dennis L. Beck 26 Complaint filed: April 13, 2011 27 28 [ PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT RE DISCOVERY CASE NO: 1:12-cv-00221-AWI-DLB 27042\3250070.1 1 Following the Joint Discovery Conference between plaintiff John Stewart (“plaintiff”) and 2 defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“NPC”) on August 22, 2012, before this Court, 3 it is HEREBY ORDERED: 4 DISCOVERY PLAN: 5 To the extent the parties’ prior agreements regarding discovery are memorialized in the 6 Joint Scheduling Report [Docket No. 36] and/or the Joint Discovery Report [Docket 43], and/or 7 to the extent certain discovery issues were the subject of this Court’s prior Scheduling Order 8 [Docket 39], this Order does not alter those agreements or that Order. 9 A. Initial Disclosures 10 If a responding party fails to timely serve a fact sheet, or serves a fact sheet that is timely 11 but not complete in all material aspects, this Court declines NPC’s request that the issuing party 12 be allowed to seek an Order to Show Cause within fifteen days after service of a deficiency letter. 13 Instead, the Court will permit the issuing party to file the appropriate discovery motion regarding 14 any outstanding deficiencies. 15 B. Subjects on Which Discovery May Be Needed 16 Discovery will be bifurcated between liability and damages, so that if there are witnesses 17 who are anticipated to testify solely on damages related issues, those depositions will proceed 18 after dispositive motions have been heard and ruled upon. 19 C. 20 To the extent plaintiff wishes to propound written discovery upon NPC, the parties shall 21 first meet and confer. If following that meet-and-confer the parties cannot reach an agreement, 22 the parties may involve the Court. The Court further orders that each party is limited to 23 conducting ten (10) non-party depositions. If a party believes that further depositions are needed, 24 the parties shall meet and confer. If following that meet-and-confer the parties are unable to 25 reach an agreement, the parties may involve the Court. 26 27 28 Changes to Limitations on Discovery 1. Ex Parte Contacts The Court declines plaintiff’s request to enter an order barring NPC from having ex parte contacts with treating physicians or health care providers. The Court suggests that to the extent -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER RE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT RE DISCOVERY CASE NO: 1:12-cv-00221-AWI-DLB 27042\3250070.1 1 NPC believes substantive contact with treating physicians or health care providers are necessary, 2 that such contacts occur with both parties’ participation. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis October 9, 2012 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 DEAC_Signature-END: 7 3b142a 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT RE DISCOVERY CASE NO: 1:12-cv-00221-AWI-DLB 27042\3250070.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?