Atcherley v. Clark et al
Filing
214
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Request To Take Notice of Pending Surgery (Document 213 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILBUR ATCHERLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
CLARK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO TAKE NOTICE OF
PENDING SURGERY
(Document 213)
17
Plaintiff William Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
18
in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Third
19
20
Amended Complaint, filed on January 26, 2015, for violation of the Eighth Amendment and
negligence against numerous Defendants.
21
There are three motions for summary judgment pending, two of which have been stayed. The
22
remaining motion is fully briefed and awaiting decision.
23
On February 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion in which he requests that the Court take notice of
24
25
26
his knee surgery, which will take place in the next 7 to 10 days.1 He states that he will be at an outside
hospital for 7 to 15 days following the surgery and will not be issued any mail during this time.
27
28
1
Plaintiff signed the motion on January 28, 2015.
1
1
2
3
At this time, the only deadline pending is related to Plaintiff’s return of service documents for
newly named Defendants J. Kim and R.N. Montebon. Pursuant to the January 29, 2015, order, the
service documents are due on or about March 3, 2015. Because it is possible that Plaintiff may
4
comply with this deadline despite his surgery, the Court will not extend the deadline at this time.
5
However, the Court will take Plaintiff’s surgery into consideration should he not respond prior
6
7
8
to March 3, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
February 4, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?