Atcherley v. Clark et al

Filing 25

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why Defendant Arbadia Should not be Dismissed Pursuant to Rule 4(M) signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 01/17/2014. Show Cause Response due by 2/24/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 WILLIAM ATCHERLEY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. EDGAR CLARK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:12cv00225 DLB PC ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT ARBADIA SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO RULE 4(M) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff William Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on 19 February 17, 2012. This action is proceeding on the following cognizable claims: (1) violation 20 21 22 of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Holt, Barbolla, Ceballo, Anderson, Rios, Torres, Ross, Arbadia, two Doe correctional officers and Doe LVNs; (2) medical negligence against Defendants Holt, Barbolla, Clark, Ceballo, Anderson, Ross, Arbadia, Alade and Doe LVNs; and 23 (3) negligence against Defendants Rios, Torres, and two Doe correctional officers. 24 25 26 27 28 On December 24, 2013, the Court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the amended complaint on Defendants. On January 14, 2014, the United States Marshal returned service unexecuted as to Defendant LVN Arbadia. The returns notes, “CDCR SI unable to locate/identify.” ECF. No. 24. 1 1 Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 4 If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. 5 In cases involving a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, the Marshal, upon order of 2 3 6 the Court, shall serve the summons and the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 4(c)(3). “[A]n incarcerated pro se plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to rely on the 8 U.S. Marshal for service of the summons and complaint and [he] should not be penalized by 9 having his action dismissed for failure to effect service where the U.S. Marshal or the court clerk 10 has failed to perform his duties.” Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994) (internal 11 quotations and citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Connor, 515 U.S. 472 12 (1995). “So long as the prisoner has furnished the information necessary to identify the 13 14 defendant, the marshal’s failure to effect service is automatically good cause. . . .” Walker, 14 F.3d at 1422 (internal quotations and citation omitted). However, where a pro se plaintiff fails to 15 provide the Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons 16 and complaint, the Court’s sua sponte dismissal of the unserved defendants is appropriate. 17 18 19 20 21 Walker, 14 F.3d at 1421-22. At this juncture, the Marshal’s Office has exhausted the avenues available to it in attempting to locate and serve Defendant Arbadia. Specifically, the return indicates that CDCR utilized a Special Investigator to attempt to locate and identify Defendant Arbadia. Walker, 14 22 F.3d at 1421-22. Plaintiff shall be provided with an opportunity to show cause why Defendant 23 Arbadia should not be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If Plaintiff either fails to respond to this 24 order or responds but fails to show cause, Defendant Arbadia shall be dismissed from this action. 25 26 27 28 2 1 Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 cause why Defendant Arbadia should not be dismissed from this action; and 4 5 Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show 2. The failure to respond to this order or the failure to show cause will result in the dismissal of Defendant Arbadia from this action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: 14 /s/ Dennis January 17, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 DEAC_Signature-END: 16 9b0hied 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?