Atcherley v. Clark et al

Filing 44

ORDER Extending Application of Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Clark signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 03/31/2014. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILBUR ATCHERLEY, 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 14 CLARK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC) ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT CLARK (Document 35) 17 18 Plaintiff Wilbur Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 19 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil 20 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 Defendants Ceballos, O. Borbolla, A. Holt, J. Rios, E. Torres and T. Ross filed an answer on 22 March 14, 2014. As a result, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order on March 18, 2014. 23 At the time, all Defendants had not yet appeared.1 24 Subsequently, on March 27, 2014, Defendant Clark filed an answer. 25 26 27 1 28 Pursuant to the summons returned on March 19, 2014, it appears that Defendant Alade has been served. There is no indication that Defendants Abadia and Anderson have been served. 1 1 2 Accordingly, application of the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed on March 18, 2014, IS HEREBY EXTENDED to Defendant Clark. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis March 31, 2014 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 9 L. Beck 9b0hied 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?