Atcherley v. Clark et al

Filing 62

ORDER Extending Application of Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants Anderson and Abadia, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 05/14/14.(30)Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILBUR ATCHERLEY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. CLARK, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC) ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANTS ANDERSON AND ABADIA (Document 35) 17 Plaintiff Wilbur Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 18 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Defendants Ceballos, O. Borbolla, A. Holt, J. Rios, E. Torres and T. Ross filed an answer on 21 March 14, 2014. As a result, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order on March 18, 2014. 22 At the time, all Defendants had not yet appeared. The Discovery and Scheduling Order was extended 23 to Defendant Clark on March 31, 2014, and to Defendant Alade on May 1, 2014. 24 Defendants Anderson and Abadia have now filed answers. 25 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, application of the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed on March 18, 2014, is HEREBY EXTENDED to Defendants Anderson and Abadia. Defendants SHALL provide initial disclosures within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order. 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis May 14, 2014 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?