Atcherley v. Clark et al
Filing
62
ORDER Extending Application of Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendants Anderson and Abadia, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 05/14/14.(30)Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILBUR ATCHERLEY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CLARK, et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12cv00225 LJO DLB (PC)
ORDER EXTENDING APPLICATION OF
DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO
DEFENDANTS ANDERSON AND ABADIA
(Document 35)
17
Plaintiff Wilbur Atcherley (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California
18
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil
19
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
Defendants Ceballos, O. Borbolla, A. Holt, J. Rios, E. Torres and T. Ross filed an answer on
21
March 14, 2014. As a result, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order on March 18, 2014.
22
At the time, all Defendants had not yet appeared. The Discovery and Scheduling Order was extended
23
to Defendant Clark on March 31, 2014, and to Defendant Alade on May 1, 2014.
24
Defendants Anderson and Abadia have now filed answers.
25
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, application of the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed on March 18, 2014, is
HEREBY EXTENDED to Defendants Anderson and Abadia. Defendants SHALL provide initial
disclosures within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order.
4
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
May 14, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?