Williams v. Harrington et al

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING 82 Motion for Status Conference for Clarification of the Modified Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/26/16. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

MARCUS R. WILLIAMS,

12
13

Case No. 1:12-cv-00226 LJO DLB PC
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
REQUESTING CLARIFICATION OF
MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.

14
15
16

[ECF No. 82]
KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff Marcus R. Williams is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this

19 civil rights action.
20

On January 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for status conference requesting

21 clarification of the modified scheduling order. Plaintiff seeks clarification of the scheduling
22 order in light of alleged outstanding discovery requests. As stated in the Court’s orders issued on
23 October 5, 2015, and January 21, 2016, discovery is closed.

The Court resolved the last

24 remaining discovery issues on July 17, 2015, and lifted the stay on October 5, 2015. Plaintiff’s
25 requests for additional time to conduct discovery on November 9, 2015, and December 28, 2015,
26 were denied as untimely. At this time, Defendants’ supplemental motion for summary judgment
27 is due on February 16, 2016. Pursuant to the Court’s order of October 5, 2015, Plaintiff may file
28 an opposition within thirty days after the date of service of Defendants’ supplemental motion for

1

1 summary judgment, and Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition within fourteen
2 days from the date of service of Plaintiff’s opposition.
3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for status conference for

4 clarification of the modified scheduling order is DENIED.
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

January 26, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2