Gripenstraw v. Blazin' Wings, Inc.

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER Setting Final Approval Hearing Date, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/13/2014. Final Approval Hearing set for 5/19/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before District Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK NORMAN B. BLUMENTHAL, Bar No. 068687 KYLE R. NORDREHAUG, Bar No. 205975 APARAJIT BHOWMIK, Bar No. 248066 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: 858.551.1223 Facsimile: 858.551.1232 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMES GRIPENSTRAW STACEY E. JAMES, Bar No. 185651 MATTHEW E. FARMER, Bar No. 190484 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 501 W. Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92101.3577 Telephone: 619.232.0441 Facsimile: 619.232.4302 Attorneys for Defendant BLAZIN’ WINGS, INC. 12 13 14 15 16 MATTHEW E. FARMER, Bar No. 190484 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 5200 North Palm Avenue, Suite 302 Fresno, California 93704.2225 Telephone: 559.244.7500 Facsimile: 559.244.7525 Attorneys for Defendant BLAZIN’ WINGS, INC. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 JAMES GRIPENSTRAW, an individual, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 22 Case No. 1:12-CV-00233-AWI-SMS STIPULATION TO SET FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DATE Plaintiff, 23 District Judge: Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii Magistrate Judge: Judge Sandra M. Snyder v. 24 25 BLAZIN’ WINGS, INC., d/b/a BLAZIN’ WINGS, a Minnesota Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, 26 Defendant. 27 28 BNB AT T ORNE YS AT LA W SAN DIE GO STIPULATION TO SET FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DATE (No. 1:12-CV-00233-AWI-SMS ) 1 Plaintiff JAMES GRIPENSTRAW (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant BLAZIN' WINGS, INC. 2 (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby submit this Stipulation To Set A 3 Final Approval Hearing Date. The parties respectfully request the Court enter an Order approving 4 their Stipulation on the following grounds: 5 Whereas, the Court has entered the Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement 6 7 [Doc. No. 28] ,which states “Upon completion of mailing of the Notice packets to class members the 8 parties will inform the Court that notice has been given. The Court will then set a date for a hearing 9 to be held in Courtroom 2 of the United States District Court, Eastern District, before Honorable 10 11 Anthony W. Ishii to evaluate whether the Court should grant final approval of the settlement.” (Doc. No. 28, 26:22-26); 12 Whereas, a Final Approval hearing date must be set before the mailing of the Notice of 13 14 Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement and Proposed Hearing Date for Court Approval 15 (“Notice”), so that class members will receive notice of the Final Approval Hearing date in the 16 Notice; 17 18 19 Whereas, the date for the Final Approval Hearing can be set 90 days from the February 17, 2014 scheduled mailing date of the Notice. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 20 21 1. The date for the Final Approval Hearing shall be set for May 19 at 1:30 p.m., or as 22 soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 23 Dated: January 10, 2014 24 By: /s/ Kyle Nordrehaug KYLE NORDREHAUG BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMES GRIPENSTRAW 25 26 27 28 B LUMENTHAL , N ORDREHAUG & B HOWMIK STIPULATION TO SET FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DATE (No. 1:12-CV-00233-AWI-SMS ) 2. 1 Dated: January 10, 2014 2 By: /s/ Lindsey Stevens LINDSEY STEVENS LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant BLAZIN’ WINGS, INC. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Final Approval Hearing Date is set for May 19, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. in the above entitled Court. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 13, 2014 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B LUMENTHAL , N ORDREHAUG & B HOWMIK STIPULATION TO SET FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DATE (No. 1:12-CV-00233-AWI-SMS ) 3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?