Archer et al v. City of Taft, Ca. Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER DENYING 37 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery as Moot, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/17/2014. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARRELL ARCHER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14

v.
CITY OF TAFT, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00261 - LJO - JLT
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY AS MOOT
(Doc. 37)

Plaintiffs Darrell Archer and Keitha Darquea seek to compel defendant Jill Gipson to respond to

17

their requests for written discovery, including their “Requests to Produce Responses to Interrogatories

18

and Production of Documents”. (Doc. 37 at 2.) On June 9, 2014, Defendant belatedly served her

19

responses to Plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories and her verified Response to Requests for Production of

20

Documents. (Doc. 42 at 1-2.) Though Plaintiffs ask the Court to grant the motion despite this (Doc.

21

44), because everything sought by the motion has been provided via Defendants’ responses, there is no

22

further relief the Court could grant. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ motion to

23

compel discovery (Doc. 37) is DENIED as MOOT.

24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 17, 2014

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1