Ronald Moore v. Valley Auto Maintenance, Inc. et al

Filing 12

SECOND STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time for Surinder Pal Goswamy to respond to complaint. Surinder Pal Goswamy shall have to and including May 18, 2012, within which to file a responsive pleading in this matter. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/25/2012. (Timken, A)

1
2
3

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

RONALD MOORE,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
VALLEY AUTO MAINTENANCE, INC., et )
)
al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

No. 1:12-cv-00267-LJO-SKO
SECOND STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SURINDER
PAL GOSWAMY TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER

18

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ronald Moore (“Plaintiff”), through his attorney of record, and

19

Defendant Surinder Pal Goswamy (“Defendant,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), who

20

is presently self-represented, filed a stipulation on March 23, 2012 extending the time for

21

Defendant to respond to the Complaint to and including April 23, 2012;

22
23

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have been engaged in meaningful settlement
negotiations and are optimistic that a settlement will be reached;

24

WHEREAS, Defendant seeks to have the opportunity to confer with co-defendant

25

Valley Auto Maintenance, Inc. and its counsel regarding a potential global resolution of this

26

matter, and needs more time to evaluate and explore this option;

27
28

WHEREAS, Defendant is self-represented and is hoping to avoid the costs involved
with retaining counsel and filing an answer while settlement is being explored;

Moore v. Valley Auto Maintenance, Inc., et al.
Second Stipulation for Extension of Time; Order
Page 1

1

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that Defendant shall

2

have to and including May 18, 2012 to file his responsive pleading. Such extension does not

3

alter or affect any date or event previously set by the Court, but does exceed the maximum

4

twenty-eight (28) days that can be granted by Plaintiff without leave of Court. The Parties are

5

mindful of their meet and confer obligations prior to the scheduling conference and this

6

extension will not affect those requirements.

7

Date: April 25, 2012

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

9
10
11

Date: April 24, 2012

/s/ Surinder Pal Goswamy
Defendant Surinder Pal Goswamy,
In Pro Per

12
13
14

ORIGINAL SIGNATURE RETAINED BY ATTORNEY TANYA E. MOORE.

15
16
ORDER

17
18

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Surinder Pal Goswamy shall have to and

20

including May 18, 2012, within which to file a responsive pleading in this matter.

21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27

Dated:

April 25, 2012

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAC_Signature-END:

ie14hje

28

Moore v. Valley Auto Maintenance, Inc., et al.
Second Stipulation for Extension of Time; Order
Page 2