Cejas v. Myers, et al.
Filing
129
ORDER granting 127 Motion to modify Discovery and Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/9/2015. (Dispositive Motions: filing ddl: 1/11/2016).(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW A. CEJAS,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
MYERS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. 1:12-cv-00271-AWI-DLB PC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Document 127)
Dispositive Motions: January 11, 2016
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff Andrew A. Cejas (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Pursuant to the May 13, 2015, Discovery and Scheduling Order, the current deadline for
dispositive motions is December 9, 2015.
On November 20, 2015, Defendants filed a joint motion to extend the dispositive motion
22
deadline to January 11, 2016. The Court deems the matter suitable for decision without an
23
opposition.
24
DISCUSSION
25
Modification of the pretrial scheduling order requires a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ.
26
P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of
27
the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087
28
(9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992)).
1
1
“If the party seeking the modification ‘was not diligent, the inquiry should end’ and the motion to
2
modify should not be granted.” Id.
3
Here, Defendants seek an extension of the December 9, 2015, dispositive motion deadline
4
due to work-load issues and prior commitments of counsel. For good cause, the Court GRANTS the
5
request and extends the dispositive motion deadline to January 11, 2016.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
December 9, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?