Cejas v. Myers, et al.

Filing 141

ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's 140 Objections to Defendants' Request to Supplement Motion signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/26/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDREW A. CEJAS, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. MYERS, et al., 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-00271-AWI-DLB PC ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION (Document 140) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Andrew A. Cejas (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on 19 Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint for violation of the First Amendment against numerous 20 Defendants. 21 Defendants’ January 11, 2016, motion for summary judgment is pending. 22 On January 15, 2016, the Court granted Defendants’ January 14, 2016, request to supplement 23 24 their motion for summary judgment with the declaration of the custodian of records. On January 25, 2016, the Court received “objections” from Plaintiff. Plaintiff argues that 25 Defendants should not be permitted to supplement the record with additional evidence after the 26 January 11, 2016, dispositive motion deadline. Plaintiff contends that this is a violation of his due 27 process rights. 28 1 1 Defendants supplemented the record to add the declaration of the custodian of records. This 2 document, which Defendants were in the process of obtaining when they filed their motion for 3 summary judgment, has nothing to do with the underlying merits of Plaintiff’s action. Rather, the 4 declaration will assist the parties in evaluating the authenticity of certain prison records. 5 Plaintiff has not been prejudiced in any way and his objections are DISREGARDED. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis January 26, 2016 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?