Cejas v. Myers, et al.

Filing 75

ORDER striking Plaintiff's Replies to Answers re 73 and 74 signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/8/2015. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

ANDREW A. CEJAS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
W.K. MYERS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)_

1:12cv00271 AWI DLB PC
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S
REPLIES TO ANSWERS
(Document 73 and 74)

17

Plaintiff Andrew Cejas (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

18
19

in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983.

20

Defendants Trimbler and Myers filed answers on May 11, 2015.1

21

On June 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a document intending to respond to Defendants answers.

22

Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provide for a reply to an

23

answer, absent an order from the Court requiring one. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). In this case, the

24

///

25

///

26
27
28

1

Defendants did not file a single answer, but rather seven separate answers.
1

1
2

Court did not order a reply to the answers. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s reply to the answers filed by
Defendants Trimbler and Myers are HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated:
6

/s/ Dennis

June 8, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2