Perry v. Garcia et al
Filing
42
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition re 41 Motion for Summary Judgment Within Twenty-One Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/22/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LEWIS PERRY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
JOHN GARCIA, et al.,
14
Case No. 1:12-cv-00312-AWI-SKO (PC)
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
(Doc. 41)
15
16
Plaintiff Lewis Perry, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
17 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on February 21, 2012. This action for damages is
18 proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant Nguyen for violation of
19 the Eighth Amendment. On May 11, 2015, Defendant Nguyen filed a motion for summary
20 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response.
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a
22 statement of non-opposition to Defendant Nguyen’s motion within twenty-one (21) days.
23 Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this
24 action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated:
June 22, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?