Morales v. Kumar et al

Filing 25

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/6/2012. This Court ORDERS the parties, no later than September 5, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed; This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JOHN MORALES,

10

CASE NO. CV F 12-0340 LJO SKO
Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT
(Doc. 24.)

11
JAGDISH KUMAR, et al.,
12
13

Defendants.
____________________________/

14

Plaintiff’s counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties.

15

Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than September 5,

16

2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause

17

why the action has not been dismissed.

18

This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates.

19

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or

20

parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court

21

ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil

22

Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems

23

appropriate.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:
66h44d

27
28

August 6, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE