Morales v. Kumar et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/17/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
John Morales

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN MORALES,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14
15

JAGDISH KUMAR, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17

) No. 1:12-cv-00340-LJO-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff John Morales and Defendants

20

Jagdish Kumar and Rajinder Kaur, Ricardo Sanchez and Maria Sanchez dba El Pescador

21

Seafood Taqueria (“Defendants”), the parties to this action, by and through their respective

22

counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned

23

action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

24

Date: August 17, 2012

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff John Morales

27
28

///

Morales v. Kumar, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; Order

Page 1

1

Date: August 16, 2012

2
3

KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER,
COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP

/s/ Gary Logan
Gary Logan
Attorneys for Defendants Jagdish Kumar,
Rajinder Kaur, Ricardo Sanchez and Maria
Sanchez dba El Pescador Seafood Taqueria

4
5
6
7
8
9

ORDER

10
11

The parties having so stipulated,

12

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

Dated: August 17, 2012

17

Lawrence J. O’Neill
United States District Court Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Morales v. Kumar, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; Order

Page 2