Dearmon v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/6/13. The New Case Number is: 2:13-cv-00230-CKD. Old Case Number 1:12-cv-00345-AWI-SKO. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CINDI DEARMON, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) _____________________________________ ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-00345-AWI-SKO ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 18 denying applications for Disability Income Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles 19 II an XVI of the Social Security Act. Under the venue statute governing this action, Plaintiff may 20 obtain review of any final decision of the Commissioner made after a hearing to which the plaintiff 21 was a party by commencing a civil action in the federal district court for the judicial district in which 22 the claimant resides. 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). 23 On December 19, 2012, the Court issued an order that Plaintiff state her place of residence 24 and, to the extent that Plaintiff's residence was outside the Fresno Division of the U.S. District Court 25 for the Eastern District of California ("Eastern District"), to show cause why the case should not be 26 transferred to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District. Plaintiff's declaration reflects that she 27 resides in Jackson, California, which is in Amador County. (Doc. 23-1.) That county is part of the 28 Sacramento Division of the Eastern District. See Local Rule 120(d). 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 2 division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. 3 Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division of the Court. This Court retains 4 jurisdiction following transfer to issue a collateral order regarding sanctions against Plaintiff's 5 counsel, Sengthiene Bosavanh. (See Docs. 24, 25.) Cf. United Energy Owners v. United Energy 6 Mgmt., 837 F.2d 356, 358 (9th Cir. 1988) (district court retained jurisdiction to impose sanctions 7 while plaintiffs' appeal from judgment of dismissal was pending). 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. 10 This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; 11 2. The Clerk of the Court shall assign a new case number; and 12 3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at: 13 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 I Street Sacramento, California, 95814 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: d70o4d February 6, 2013 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?