Miller v. Adonis, et al.

Filing 93

ORDER re Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants Eddings and Walker With Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/8/2018. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER, State Bar No. 230529
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants Chudy, Eddings,
Friederichs, Medina, and Walker

9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

FRESNO DIVISION

12
13
CHARLES A. MILLER,

No. 1:12-cv-00353 DAD-EPG

14
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS
EDDINGS AND WALKER WITH
PREJUDICE AND ORDER
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

15
v.
16
17

M. ADONIS, et al.,
Judge:
Hon. Dale A. Drozd
Defendants. Trial Date:
August 6, 2019
Action Filed: June 15, 2010

18
19
20
21

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Charles A. Miller and

22

Defendants Eddings and Walker, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate to the voluntary

23

dismissal of this action with prejudice as against Defendants Eddings and Walker only.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
1

1

Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney’s fees, or expenses.

2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4

Dated: January 24, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

5

XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
CHRISTOPHER J. BECKER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

6
7
8

/s/ Diana Esquivel

9

DIANA ESQUIVEL
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants

10
11
12

Dated: January 30, 2018

/s/ Charles A. Miller
CHARLES A. MILLER
Plaintiff Pro se

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1
2

ORDER
Based upon the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 92), Defendants Eddings and Walker have

3

been dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111

4

F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed terminate Defendants Eddings

5

and Walker on the docket sheet. Plaintiff’s case now proceeds against Defendants Chudy,

6

Medina and Frederichs.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

February 8, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3