Wilhelm v. Woodford

Filing 35

ORDER denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/4/2014. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEVE WILHELM, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. JEANNIE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-00386-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [ECF No. 33] Plaintiff Steve Wilhelm is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s third motion for appointment of counsel, filed January 31, 2014. 21 As Plaintiff was previously advised, Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to the 22 appointment of counsel in this action. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009); Storseth 23 v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of 24 counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but it will do so only if exceptional circumstances exist. 25 Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). In making this 26 determination, the Court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of 27 Plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer 28 at 970 (citation and quotation marks omitted); Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. Neither consideration is 1 1 dispositive and they must be viewed together. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation marks 2 omitted); Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. 3 In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances as the Court 4 has recommended that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a 5 cognizable claim. 6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s January 31, 2014 motion for the appointment of 8 counsel is DENIED. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 4, 2014 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?