Randolph v. Nix et al

Filing 84

ORDER Setting Settlement Conference for November 4, 2015 at 9:30 A.M. at California State Prison-Corcoran, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/13/2015. (Settlement Conference set for 11/4/2015 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston)(Copy of this order emailed to Litigation Coordinator at CSP-Corcoran)(Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

COLIN M. RANDOLPH,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

Case No. 1:12-cv-00392-LJO-MJS (PC)
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
NOVEMBER 4, 2015 AT 9:30 A.M.
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISONCORCORAN

B. NIX, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

14
15

rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this

16

case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this case will be referred to

17

Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston to conduct a settlement conference at California

18

State Prison, Corcoran (CSP-COR), 4001 King Avenue, Corcoran, California, on

19

November 4, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

20

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Jennifer
L. Thurston on November 4, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. at CSP-COR.

22

2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a

23

binding settlement on the defendants’ behalf shall attend in person.1

24
25
26
27
28

1

While the exercise of its authority is subject to abuse of discretion review, “the district court has the
authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement
conferences… .” United States v. United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, 694 F.3d
th
1051, 1053, 1057, 1059 (9 Cir. 2012)(“the district court has broad authority to compel participation in
mandatory settlement conference[s].”). The term “full authority to settle” means that the individuals
attending the mediation conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at
that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat
th
Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7 Cir. 1989), cited with approval in Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Goss, 6 F.3d

1

1
2

3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and

3

damages. The failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to

4

this order to appear in person may result in the imposition of sanctions. In

5

addition, the conference will not proceed and will be reset to another date.

6

4. At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to

7

Defendant, by mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful

8

settlement demand, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

9

settlement is appropriate, not to exceed ten pages in length. Thereafter, no

10

later than 14 days before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL

11

respond, by telephone or in person, with an acceptance of the offer or with a

12

meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

13

settlement is appropriate. If settlement is achieved, defense counsel is to

14

immediately inform the Courtroom Deputy of Magistrate Judge Thurston.

15

5. If settlement is not achieved informally, each party is directed to submit

16

confidential settlement statements no later than October 28, 2015 to

17

[e-mail]. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement

18

statement to U. S. District Court, ADR Director, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200,

19

Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no later than October 28, 2015. If a

20

party desires to share additional confidential information with the Court, they

21

may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Parties are

22

also directed to file a “Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement

23

Statement” (See L.R. 270(d)).

24
25
26
27
28

6. Settlement statements should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor
th

1385, 1396 (9 Cir. 1993). The individual with full authority to settle must also have “unfettered discretion
and authority” to change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc.,
216 F.R.D. 481, 485-86 (D. Ariz. 2003), amended on recon. in part, Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 2003 WL
23353478 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose behind requiring the attendance of a person with full settlement
authority is that the parties’ view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Pitman,
216 F.R.D. at 486. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or sum certain can be found not to
comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 596-97
th
(8 Cir. 2001).

2

1
2

served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly marked

3

“confidential” with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated

4

prominently thereon.

5

7. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in

6

length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following:

7

a. A brief statement of the facts of the case.

8

b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other

9

grounds upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of

10

the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a

11

description of the major issues in dispute.

12

c. A summary of the proceedings to date.

13

d. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,

14

pretrial, and trial.

15

e. The relief sought.

16

f. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and

17

offers and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and

18

demands.
g. A brief statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the

19
20
21

settlement conference.
8. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on the Litigation

22

Coordinator at California State Prison—Corcoran.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 13, 2015

/s/

26

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4