United States of America v. Approximately $10,703.71 in U.S. Currency Seized From Bank of The Sierra Account Number 1420468170 et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (g)(2), this action be stayed due to the pending related criminal prosecution; All presently scheduled court dates be vacated; and, the parties are to promptly notify the Court upon resolution of the pending criminal prosecution. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/19/2012. (Timken, A)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
HEATHER MARDEL JONES
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Facsimile: (559) 497-4099
6
Attorneys for United States
1
2
3
4
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
) 1:12-CV-00396-LJO-SKO
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
) AND ORDER
v.
)
)
APPROXIMATELY $10,703.71 IN
)
U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM
)
BANK OF THE SIERRA ACCOUNT )
NUMBER 1420468170, and
)
)
APPROXIMATELY $118.91 IN U.S.
)
CURRENCY SEIZED FROM UNION )
BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER
)
1540018207,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________)
21
The United States of America and Claimants Mark Bagdasarian and
22
Maureen Bagdasarian, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate
23
that a stay is necessary in the above-entitled action and request the Court enter an
24
order staying proceedings due to the on-going criminal prosecution United States v.
25
Bagdasarian et al, 1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO.
26
The stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (g)(2). The
27
United States contends that the defendant assets were proceeds of, involved in, or
28
facilitated the violations alleged in the Superceding Criminal Indictment (See 1:111
1
CR-00352-LJO-SKO Doc # 42).
A stay is warranted because if discovery proceeds at this time in the civil in
2
3
rem case, Claimants would be entitled to depose, among others, the agents and
4
deputies involved with this investigation. Allowing depositions of the law
5
enforcement officers at this stage of the criminal investigation could adversely affect
6
the ability of the federal authorities to effectively pursue the related criminal
7
prosecution.
8
Likewise, a stay is warranted because Claimant Mark Bagdasarian is a
9
Defendant in the related criminal prosecution, has standing to assert a claim in the
10
civil in rem forfeiture proceeding, and continuation of the forfeiture proceeding will
11
burden the right of Claimant Mark Bagdasarian against self-incrimination in the
12
related criminal prosecution.
13
As such, the parties recognize that proceeding with the civil in rem action at
14
this time could have adverse effects on the underlying criminal prosecution and/or
15
upon the Claimants' ability to prove their claim to the property and to assert any
16
defenses to forfeiture.
For these reasons, the parties jointly request that this matter be stayed
17
18
pending resolution of the related criminal prosecution.
19
THEREFORE, the parties to this action stipulate and request as follows:
20
1.
21
pending related criminal prosecution;
22
2.
All presently scheduled court dates be vacated; and,
23
3.
The parties are to promptly notify the Court upon resolution of the pending
24
criminal prosecution.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (g)(2), this action be stayed due to the
2
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
3
Dated: July 17 , 2012
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
4
5
/s/ Heather Mardel Jones
HEATHER MARDEL JONES
Assistant United States Attorney
6
7
8
9
Dated: July 17 , 2012
/s/ Nicholas Capozzi
ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI
NICHOLAS CAPOZZI
Attorneys for Claimants
Mark Bagdasarian and
Maureen Bagdasarian
10
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
Dated:
ie14hj
19
July 19, 2012
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?