Thompson v. Rosario et al

Filing 3

ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 3/26/2012. CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:12-cv-776-DAD(PC). (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MARIO THOMPSON, 10 1:12-cv-00441-GBC (PC) Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA D. ROSARIO, et al, 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 17 In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations by defendants at California State Prison, Solano. The 18 alleged violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the 19 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have 20 been filed in the Sacramento Division. 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court 22 may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be 23 transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not rule on plaintiff’s request to proceed in 24 forma pauperis. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // Page 1 of 2 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 3 California sitting in Sacramento; and 4 5 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: 6 United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 7 8 9 3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 7j8cce March 26, 2012 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?