Meredith v. Overley et al
Filing
117
ORDER DENYING Defendants' 116 Motion to advance trial date, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 09/1/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:12-cv-00455-MJS (PC)
DWAYNE MEREDITH,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO ADVANCE TRIAL DATE
Plaintiff,
v.
(ECF No. 116)
D. OVERLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights
The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth
18
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
Amendment conditions of confinement claim against Defendants Overley, Benevidez,
20
and Gamboa. (ECF No. 8.)
21
22
23
Before the Court is Defendants’ August 31, 2015 motion to advance the trial date
from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015. (ECF No. 116.)
The Court appreciates the reason for the request, but is unable to accommodate it
24
given the number and nature of matters already on its September 30, 2015 calendar.
25
The Court will, however, do everything reasonable within its power to complete trial in
26
27
28
this case in one day, on October 1, 2015. The parties should be prepared to stay as late
as reasonably necessary to accomplish that.
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request to advance the
trial date from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2015, is DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 1, 2015
/s/
7
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Michael J. Seng
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?