Carla Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees 41 , 47 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/20/16: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 CARLA MORGAN, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Case No. 1:12-CV-00470-LJO-SMS ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES (ECF Nos. 41, 47) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On June 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations (“F&Rs”) 19 recommending that Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access 20 to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be granted. (Doc. 32.) The F&Rs were served on all 21 parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within 22 fourteen (14) days after service of the order. No objections were filed. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted 24 a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that 25 the Magistrate Judge’s F&Rs are supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The F&Rs, filed June 22, 2016 (ECF No. 47), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 28 2. Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees, pursuant to EAJA 1 (ECF No. 41), is GRANTED in the amount of $12,739.01; and, 1 2 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ September 20, 2016 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?