Disney v. Kenworth
Filing
59
ORDER Granting Liberty Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Intervene re 50 , 55 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/7/2014. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERESA DISNEY,
12
13
14
15
12-cv-484 AWI-GSA
Plaintiff,
v.
KENWORTH et al.,
Defendants
ORDER GRANTING LIBERTY MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO
INTERVENE
(Docs. 50 and 55)
16
17
18
On March 14, 2014, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) filed a
19
Complaint in Intervention. (Doc. 50). It subsequently filed a Motion to Intervene on April 16,
20
2014. (Doc. 55). Defendant Capacity of Texas, Inc. filed a non-opposition to the motion on
21
April 4, 2014. (Doc.53). Plaintiff, Theresa Disney (“Plaintiff”) also filed a non-opposition on
22
23
April 29, 2014. (Doc. 58).
The Court has taken the matter under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Liberty
24
25
26
Mutual filed this motion because it paid Plaintiff workers’ compensation benefits as a result of
personal injuries Plaintiff sustained at work which are at issue in this case. None of the parties
27
oppose the motion. Additionally, it appears that Liberty Mutual has a direct interest in the
28
outcome of this case. Accordingly, Liberty Mutual’s Motion to Intervene pursuant to Federal
1
1
Rule of Civil Procedure 24 is GRANTED. The Complaint in Intervention is deemed filed as of
2
the date of the signing of this order.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
May 7, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?