Duenas v. Fischer et al

Filing 19

ORDER To Deny 18 Dismissal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/13/2012. (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARVIN DUENAS, JR., 12 CASE NO. CV F 12-0493 LJO SMS Plaintiff, ORDER TO DENY DISMISSAL (Doc. 18.) vs. 13 APRIL FISCHER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 Plaintiff filed a July 12, 2012 notice of voluntary dismissal. The notice fails to comply with 17 F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires a stipulation signed by defendants who have answered or filed 18 a summary judgment motion. As such, this Court DENIES dismissal of this action in the absence of 19 compliance with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ORDERS the remaining parties, no later than 20 July 20, 2011, to file either: (a) a stipulation which satisfies F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and a proposed 21 order to dismiss remaining defendants; or (b) papers to show good cause why the parties have failed to 22 comply with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ADMONISHES counsel to obey the Federal Rules 23 of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders. This Court FURTHER ADMONISHES 24 counsel that failure to comply with this order in the absence of good cause will result in imposition of 25 sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this action with or without prejudice. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 66h44d July 13, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?