Duenas v. Fischer et al
Filing
19
ORDER To Deny 18 Dismissal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/13/2012. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARVIN DUENAS, JR.,
12
CASE NO. CV F 12-0493 LJO SMS
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO DENY DISMISSAL
(Doc. 18.)
vs.
13
APRIL FISCHER, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
/
16
Plaintiff filed a July 12, 2012 notice of voluntary dismissal. The notice fails to comply with
17
F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), which requires a stipulation signed by defendants who have answered or filed
18
a summary judgment motion. As such, this Court DENIES dismissal of this action in the absence of
19
compliance with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ORDERS the remaining parties, no later than
20
July 20, 2011, to file either: (a) a stipulation which satisfies F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and a proposed
21
order to dismiss remaining defendants; or (b) papers to show good cause why the parties have failed to
22
comply with F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). This Court ADMONISHES counsel to obey the Federal Rules
23
of Civil Procedure and this Court’s Local Rules and orders. This Court FURTHER ADMONISHES
24
counsel that failure to comply with this order in the absence of good cause will result in imposition of
25
sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of this action with or without prejudice.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
July 13, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?