Maldonado v. Yates et al

Filing 9

ORDER Denying Request For Return Of Original Document (Doc. 8 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/12/2015. (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILLY RAY MALDONADO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 1:12-cv-00496-AWI-GSA (PC) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RETURN OF ORIGINAL DOCUMENT (Doc. 8.) JAMES YATES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On April 2, 2012, Donald Wright (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro per and 19 in forma pauperis, filed the Complaint commencing this civil rights action pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) 21 On February 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for the court to return the original 22 Complaint to him. (Doc. 8.) 23 II. CUSTODY OF DOCUMENTS; REQUEST FOR COPIES 24 Plaintiff explains that he thought he was supposed to submit his medical documents 25 with the Complaint, but later discovered this was not true. Now Plaintiff requests the Clerk to 26 return his original Complaint to him. 27 The Eastern District of California is an electronic case management/filing district 28 (CM/ECF). L.R. 133. After a pro se party files a paper document, the Clerk transforms the 1 1 paper filing into an electronic record and ultimately discards the paper filing. Id. Local Rules 2 require that all paper files and records of the court remain in the custody of the Clerk. L.R. 3 138. No one is permitted to take records, papers, or items belonging to the files of the court 4 from the custody of the Clerk without a special order of the court and a receipt given by the 5 party obtaining it, describing it and the date of its receipt. Id. 6 Plaintiff was cautioned in the court’s First Informational Order not to send original 7 exhibits to the court, and advised that he should retain his original exhibits and send 8 photocopies to the court. (Doc. 3 at 4 ¶7.) Plaintiff was also advised about the procedure for 9 obtaining copies of court documents. (Id. at 2 ¶3.) 10 Even if the Clerk has not already discarded the paper filing, Plaintiff has not shown 11 good cause for the court to issue a special order requiring the Clerk to relinquish custody of 12 Plaintiff’s original Complaint. 13 however, the Clerk does not ordinarily provide free copies of case documents to parties. The 14 Clerk charges $.50 per page for copies of documents. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Copies of up 15 to 20 pages may be made by the Clerk's Office at this court upon written request and 16 prepayment of the copy fees. 17 sufficiently-large, self-addressed envelope affixed with sufficient postage, and prepayment of 18 copy costs to the Clerk. The fact that the court has granted leave for Plaintiff to proceed in 19 forma pauperis does not entitle him to free copies of documents from the court.1 Copies of the electronic record are available to Plaintiff; Plaintiff must submit a request in writing to the Clerk, a 20 For copy orders larger than 20 pages, copies of documents may be obtained from the 21 court file by contacting Attorney's Diversified Services at 741 N. Fulton Street, Fresno, 22 California 93728, 1-800−842−2695. Plaintiff’s Complaint, with its exhibits, is 145 pages long. 23 Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request shall be denied. Plaintiff is advised that in 24 the future, he should retain his original exhibits and submit photocopies, and also should retain 25 a copy of any document he submits to the court. 26 27 1 28 In the future, if Plaintiff wants a file-stamped copy of a document returned for his own benefit, he must submit the document for filing, a copy of the document, and a sufficiently large pre-addressed envelope with sufficient postage affixed. 2 1 2 3 III. CONCLUSION Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for return of his original Complaint is DENIED. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 12, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?