Hanna v. Mariposa County Sheriff Dept. et al

Filing 104

ORDER ADOPTING 97 Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/6/2014. Motion for Preliminary Injunction 93 is DENIED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD CHARLES HANNA,

12
13

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:12-cv-00501-AWI-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
(ECF Nos. 93, 97)

14

MARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff Richard Charles Hanna is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations
recommending denying Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief which was served on the parties
and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and
Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. More than thirty days have passed and no
objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

28
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3

The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 27, 2014, is ADOPTED IN
FULL;

4

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed January 23, 2014 is DENIED; and

5

3.

This action is referred back to the magistrate judge.

6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2014
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2