Hanna v. Mariposa County Sheriff Dept. et al

Filing 35

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re 33 , Requiring Defendants Mariposa County Sheriff Department, Boehm, King, Rameriz and Rumfelt to Show Cause why the United States Marshal's Request for Reimbursement of Costs of Service should not be granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 7/23/13. (20) Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD CHARLES HANNA, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. MARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. et al., 15 Case No. 1:12-cv-00501-AWI-SAB ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS MARIPOSA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., BOEHM, KING, RAMERIZ, AND RUMFELT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF SERVICE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 33) 17 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY DAYS 18 19 On January 8, 2013, an order issued directing the United States Marshal (“Marshal”) to 20 serve process upon the defendants in this action. (ECF No. 23.) The Marshal was directed to 21 attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on the defendants. If a 22 waiver of service was not returned within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal 23 service on the defendants in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rule of Civil 24 Procedure, without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any 25 attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in 26 effecting personal service. 27 On July 15, 2013, return of service forms were filed showing a waiver of service was 28 mailed to Defendants Mariposa County Sheriff Department, Deputy Boehm, Deputy Rumfelt, 1 1 Deputy Ramirez, and Deputy King on February 6, 2013. Having received no response, personal 2 service was assigned on May 6, 2013. The complaint was served on May 16, 2013. The forms 3 also show total charges of $71.95 for effecting personal service on Defendants Mariposa County 4 Sheriff Department, Deputy Boehm, Deputy Rumfelt, Deputy Ramirez, and Deputy King. (ECF 5 No. 32.) On this same date, the Marshal filed a request for a court order requiring Defendants to 6 reimburse the costs incurred by the Marshal for personal service, pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) of the 7 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 33.) 8 Rule 4(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part that an individual 9 “that is subject to service under Rule 4(e), (f), or (h) has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of 10 serving the summons.” 11 12 If a defendant located within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court must impose on the defendant: 13 (A) the expenses later incurred in making service. . . . 14 15 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2). 16 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 17 1. Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants 18 Mariposa County Sheriff Department, Deputy Boehm, Deputy Rumfelt, Deputy 19 Ramirez, and Deputy King shall show cause why the Marshal’s Request for 20 Reimbursement, filed on July 15, 2013, should not be granted; 21 2. Defendants’ failure to comply with this order shall result in an order requiring 22 Defendants Mariposa County Sheriff Department, Deputy Boehm, Deputy 23 Rumfelt, Deputy Ramirez, and Deputy King to reimburse the Marshal for costs of 24 personal service; and 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 1 3. The Clerk’s Office is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Mariposa County 2 Sheriff’s Office, Litigation Coordinator, 5099 Old Highway Rd., P.O. Box 276, 3 Mariposa, CA 95338. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 July 23, 2013 _ _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?