Smith v. Largoza et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 ; ORDER DISMISSING Action, WITH PREJUDICE, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted Under Section 1983; ORDER That Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G); ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/31/13: This dismissal is subject to the "three-strikes" provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011). (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JEANETTE SMITH, 11 12 13 14 1:12-cv-00503-LJO-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 10.) vs. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED UNDER SECTION 1983 DR. LARGOZA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 ORDER THAT DISMISSAL IS SUBJECT TO 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(G) 17 ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 18 19 Jeanette Smith (Aplaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On November 21, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 23 that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may 24 be granted under §1983. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings 25 and recommendations within thirty days. The thirty-day deadline has passed, and plaintiff has 26 not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. 27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 28 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, 1 1 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 4 1. 5 6 November 21, 2013, are adopted in full; 2. 7 8 This action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on plaintiff=s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983; 3. 9 10 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on This dismissal is subject to the Athree-strikes@ provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Silva v. Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2011); and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill December 31, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?