Gorrell v. Sneath et al

Filing 72

ORDER DEFERRING Plaintiff's Motion to Allow His Expert to Testify at Trial Via Telephone or Video Conference; ORDER REQUIRING Rule 26 Expert Disclosure, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/29/2013. Motion Deferred 71 . (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILSON GORRELL, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 THOMAS SNEATH, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:12-cv-0554 - JLT ORDER DEFERRING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOW HIS EXPERT TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL VIA TELEPHONE ORVIDEO CONFERENCE; ORDER REQUIRING RULE 26 EXPERT DISCLOSURE (Doc. 71) 16 On July 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a request to allow his expert to testify via telephone or video 17 18 conference at trial. (Doc. 71) Permitting this type of testimony may be permitted but notably, Plaintiff 19 has not properly disclosed an expert. The fact he has provided a letter from one doctor and an un- 20 signed page of notes from another does not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). Therefore, the Court 21 will not decide at this time whether testimony should be allowed in this fashion. Instead, the Court 22 ORDERS: 1. 23 No later than August 23, 2013, Plaintiff SHALL disclose his expert to Defendants and 24 to file the disclosure with the Court. This disclosure SHALL comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). 25 Assuming this occurs, Defendants SHALL complete expert discovery no later than September 20, 26 2013;1 27 28 1 In the event Plaintiff’s disclosure requires Defendants to disclose a rebuttal expert, Defendants may file a request to do so no later than September 6, 2013. 1 1 2 2. The determination of Plaintiff’s request for his expert to testify at trial via telephone or video-conference is DEFERRED until Plaintiff makes his compliant expert disclosure. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?