I. R. et al v. City Of Fresno et al

Filing 104

STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Scheduling Order and Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order in Accordance With Order Granting Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Designate a Rebuttal Expert (Docs. 24 , 71 , 97 ) signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/30/2014. (Martinez, A)

1

James D. Weakley, Esq.
Brande L. Gustafson, Esq.

Bar No. 082853
Bar No. 267130

2
3
4
5

Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, CHRISTIAN LIGHTNER, and MANUEL
FLORES

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

I.R., a minor, individually and as successor in ) CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00558-AWI-GSA
interest to Raul Rosas and by and through her ) (Consolidated with Case No. 1:13-CV-00850guardian ad litem, Claudia Nava, et al.,
) AWI-GSA)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
Plaintiffs,
) MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND
) ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES
vs.
) AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipality, et al.
) ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH
) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX
Defendants.
) PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
______________________________________ DESIGNATE A REBUTTAL EXPERT
) (DOC. NOS. 24, 71 & 97)
)
RAUL ROSAS, an individual; and EVA
)
ROSAS, an individual;
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
) Complaint Filed: 04/06/12
Trial Date: 12/02/14
)
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipality, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)

23
24

THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City

25

of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian

26

Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respective counsel, have stipulated in accordance

27

with Magistrate Judge Austin’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to

28

Designate a Rebuttal Expert (Doc. No. 97), to modify the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 24) and
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order

1

Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) only as it pertains to

2

taking the deposition of the individual Plaintiffs designate as a rebuttal expert on the defense of

3

excited delirium.

4
5

The current deadline for expert discovery is May 16, 2014. The parties stipulate that the
discovery deadline be extended to June 6, 2014 just as to deposing the foregoing individual.

6
7

Dated: April 28, 2014

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

8
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson
James D. Weakley
Brande L. Gustafson
Attorneys for Defendants County
of Fresno, C. Lightner & M. Flores

9
10
11
12

Dated: April 29, 2014

13

LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM

14
/s/ Melanie T. Partow
Dale K. Galipo
Brian E. Claypool
Melanie T. Partow
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, I.R., H.R.,
Eva Rosas, and Raul Rosas, Sr.

15
16
17
18
19

Dated: April 28, 2014

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN, LLP
/s/ Bruce D. Praet
Bruce D. Praet
Attorneys for Defendants City of Fresno,
M. Alvarez, S. Ashworth, & T. Miller

20
21
22
23

ORDER
24

The above stipulation is adopted. This Court’s Scheduling Order issued on September 13,

25
26

2012 (Doc. No. 24) and its Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc.

27

No. 71) are modified in accordance with the above stipulation and this Court’s Order Granting

28

Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Designate a Rebuttal Expert (Doc. No. 97). All
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order

1

other dates and orders contained in the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc.

2

No. 24) and in the October 18, 2013 Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling

3

Order (Doc. No. 71) remain in full force and effect.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

April 30, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order