I. R. et al v. City Of Fresno et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Scheduling Order and Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Docs. 24 and 71 ) signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/30/2014. (Martinez, A)

1

James D. Weakley, Esq.
Brande L. Gustafson, Esq.

Bar No. 082853
Bar No. 267130

2
3
4

Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, CHRISTIAN LIGHTNER, and MANUEL
FLORES

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

I.R., a minor, individually and as successor in ) CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00558-AWI-GSA
interest to Raul Rosas and by and through her ) (Consolidated with Case No. 1:13-CV-00850guardian ad litem, Claudia Nava, et al.,
) AWI-GSA)
Plaintiffs,
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
) MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND
vs.
) ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipality, et al.
) AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING
) ORDER (DOC. NOS. 24 & 71)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________ )
)
RAUL ROSAS, an individual; and EVA
)
ROSAS, an individual;
) Complaint Filed: 04/06/12
Plaintiffs,
) Trial Date: 12/02/14
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipality, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

23
24

THE PARTIES, plaintiffs I.R., H.R, Raul Rosas, Sr., and Eva Rosas and defendants City

25

of Fresno, Miguel Alvarez, Sammy Ashworth, Troy Miller, County of Fresno, Christian

26

Lightner, and Manuel Flores, through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the

27

Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and the Order Consolidating

28

Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71) issued on October 18, 2013 as they pertain
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order

1

to taking the deposition of Plaintiffs’ police practices expert Roger A. Clark.

2

The current deadline for expert discovery is May 16, 2014. The parties stipulate that the

3

discovery deadline be extended to June 3, 2014 just for taking the deposition of Plaintiffs’ police

4

practices expert Roger A. Clark on June 3, 2014.

5

continuance of Roger A. Clark’s deposition will in no way prejudice Defendants’ ability to file a

6

motion concerning Plaintiffs’ expert Roger A. Clark.

The parties further stipulate that the

7
8

Dated: May 28, 2014

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

9
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson
James D. Weakley
Brande L. Gustafson
Attorneys for Defendants County
of Fresno, C. Lightner & M. Flores

10
11
12
13

Dated: May 28, 2014

14

LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO
THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM

15
/s/ Melanie T. Partow
Dale K. Galipo
Brian E. Claypool
Melanie T. Partow
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, I.R., H.R.,
Eva Rosas, and Raul Rosas, Sr.

16
17
18
19
20

Dated: May 28, 2014

FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN, LLP
/s/ Bruce D. Praet
Bruce D. Praet
Attorneys for Defendants City of Fresno,
M. Alvarez, S. Ashworth, & T. Miller

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order

ORDER

1
2
3
4

The above stipulation is adopted. This Court’s Scheduling Order issued on September 13,
2012 (Doc. No. 24) and its Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc.
No. 71) are modified nunc pro tunc in accordance with the above stipulation. All other dates and

5
orders contained in the Scheduling Order issued on September 13, 2012 (Doc. No. 24) and in the
6
7
8

October 18, 2013 Order Consolidating Cases and Modifying Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 71)
remain in full force and effect.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 30, 2014

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation & Order to
Modify Scheduling Order