Arias et al v. Amador et al

Filing 40

ORDER to REOPEN CASE and DISMISS Defendants City of Ceres and Art De Werk, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/22/2014. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

ELIDA ARIAS and JOSE J.
MARTINEZ,
Plaintiffs,

8
9

ORDER TO REOPEN CASE AND
DISMISS DEFENDANTS CITY OF CERES
AND ART DE WERK (Doc. 36)

vs.

10
11

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-586-LJO-SAB

JULIO AMADOR, et al.,

12
Defendants.

13
14

______________________________/

15

On September 19, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation under Fed. R. Civ. P.

16

41(a)(1)(A)(ii)1 to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Defendants City of Ceres and Art

17

De Werk only. Doc. 36. On September 22, 2014, the Court inadvertently dismissed with

18

prejudice the entire case as to all Defendants. Doc. 39. Accordingly, this Court:

19

1.

Directs the Clerk of Court to REOPEN this case and

20

2.

DISMISSES with prejudice all claims against Defendants City of Ceres and Art
De Werk only.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 22, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1

The parties stipulate to dismiss this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Doc. 36 at 1. Their request will be construed to
have been brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

1