Hemphill v. Cate et al
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/4/13. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TERRANCE HEMPHILL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00630-SAB (PC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF
MAY BE GRANTED
[ECF No. 14]
Plaintiff Terrance Hemphill is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of
19
the United States Magistrate Judge on June 22, 2012. Local Rule 302.
On September 10, 2013, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a
20
21
claim upon which relief may be granted and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within
22
thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or
23
otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any
24
claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY
2
ORDERED that this action is dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to state any claims
3
upon which relief may be granted under section 1983.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
November 4, 2013
_
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?