Moore v. Villa Mart, Inc. et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/22/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4

K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

RONALD MOORE,

) No. 1:12-CV-00655-LJO-MJS
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
vs.
)
)
VILLA MART, INC.; KEUM SOOK LEE and )
KI HONG LEE dba VILLA FOOD MART, )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendants

20

Villa Mart, Inc., Keum Sook Lee and Ki Hong Lee dba Villa Food Mart (“Defendants”), the

21

parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of

22

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its

23

entirety.

24

Date: June 22, 2012

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

25
26

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore

27
28

///

Moore v. Villa Mart, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed Order]

Page 1

1

Date: June 22, 2012

HELON & MANFREDO LLP

2
3

/s/ Donald R. Forbes
Donald R. Forbes
Attorneys for Defendants Villa Mart, Inc.,
Keum Sook Lee and Ki Hong Lee dba Villa
Food Mart

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
The parties having so stipulated,

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

11
12

The clerk is directed to close this action.

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

17
18
19

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 22, 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Moore v. Villa Mart, Inc., et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal; [Proposed Order]

Page 2