United States of America v. Bates

Filing 15

AMENDED ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re: Civil Contempt, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/1/13. New Show Cause Hearing Date set for 3/13/2013 at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Marrujo, C)

1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney
2 YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL
Assistant United States Attorneys
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
5
6 Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

1:12-cv-00701-LJO-SMS

Petitioner,

12
13

v.

14

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT

KENDALL O. BATES,

Date: March 13, 2013
Time: 8:15 A.M. NEW TIME
Ctrm: 4, 7th Floor
Honorable Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill

Respondent,

15
16
17

Upon the Petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the

18 Eastern District of California, and its exhibits including the Declaration of Revenue Officer
19 Lorena Ramos, it is hereby:
20

ORDERED that the Respondent, KENDALL O. BATES, appear before United States

21 District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill, in that Judge’s courtroom in the United States
22 Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on March 13, 2013 at 8:15 a.m.,
23 and that Respondent show cause as follows:
24

1.

Why Respondent, KENDALL O. BATES, should not be held in civil contempt

25 of this Court for his failure to comply with the Order filed August 10, 2012, directing
26 Respondent to comply with the I.R.S. Summons issued on August 5, 2011.
27 ///
28 ///
29
30

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT

1

2.

1

Why the Respondent should not be incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine

2 until he complies with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United
3 States.
4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within seven (7) calendar days after the filing of

5 this Order, the Respondent shall file and serve a written response to the “United States’
6 Petition Re: Contempt of Order Filed August 10, 2012,” filed January 31, 2013. Only those
7 issues brought into controversy by the responsive papers and supported by declaration will
8 be considered at the hearing on this Order, and any uncontested allegation in the Petition will
9 be considered admitted.
10

Respondent is hereby notified that a failure to comply with the Order will subject

11 Respondent to possible further sanctions for contempt of Court.
12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

February 1, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

16
17

66h44d

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT

2