United States of America v. Bates

Filing 24

ORDER CLOSING Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/2/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER 2 3 4 5 United States Attorney YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194 Assistant United States Attorneys 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 email: yoshinori.himel@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1:12-cv-00701-LJO-SMS PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE, REQUEST TO VACATE HEARING; ORDER CLOSING FILE Petitioner, 12 13 v. 14 KENDALL O. BATES, Respondent, 15 Taxpayer: KENDALL O. BATES 16 17 TO THIS HONORABLE COURT: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that in petitioner’s view, respondent has sufficiently complied 18 19 with the summons enforced here. Therefore, Petitioner United States of America requests that the 20 May 6, 2013, hearing on the status of the civil contempt Orders be vacated, and that the case be 21 closed. 22 Dated: May 2, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 23 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 24 25 By: 26 27 28 29 30 PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE, REQUEST TO VACATE HEARING; ORDER CLOSING FILE /s/ YHimel YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Petitioner United States of America 1 ORDER 1 2 Upon Petitioner’s notice of compliance and request to vacate hearing, the Clerk shall 3 vacate the hearing and close this file. The clerk is directed to close this action. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill May 2, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 DEAC_Signature-END: 66h44d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE, REQUEST TO VACATE HEARING; ORDER CLOSING FILE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?