United States of America v. Bates
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/24/2012 recommending that 1 IRS Summons be enforced and directing Clerk to serve Respondent at P.O. Box 25335 Fresno, CA 93729-5335. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 8/6/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
YOSHINORI H. T. HIMEL #66194
Assistant United States Attorney
Eastern District of California
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814-2322
Telephone: (916) 554-2760
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
Email: yoshinori.himel@usdoj.gov
6
Attorney for Petitioner United States of America
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
KENDALL O. BATES,
)
)
Respondent.
)
__________________________________ )
16
1:12-cv-00701-LJO-SMS
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RE: I.R.S. SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT
(Doc. 7)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
SERVE RESPONDENT BY MAIL
TAXPAYER: KENDALL O. BATES
P.O. Box 25335
Fresno, CA 93729-5335
17
18
This matter came on regularly for hearing on July 18, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in
19
Courtroom No. 1 before the Honorable Sandra M. Snyder, United States Magistrate
20
Judge, pursuant to an Order to Show Cause filed May 4, 2012 (Doc. 4). Respondent,
21
Kendall O. Bates, did not appear nor file written opposition to the verified petition filed
22
May 1, 2012 (Doc. 1). Assistant United States Attorney Benjamin E. Hall appeared, in
23
the place and instead of Assistant United States Attorney Yoshinori T. Himel, on behalf
24
of Petitioner. Internal Revenue Service Investigating Revenue Officer Lorena Ramos
25
also appeared.
26
The Verified Petition to Enforce I.R.S. Summons initiating this proceeding seeks
27
to enforce an administrative summons (Exhibit A to the petition) issued August 5, 2011,
28
to secure payment of assessed income tax liabilities for Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, for
1
the tax years ending December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001, December 31, 2003,
2
December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, and December 31, 2006.
3
Subject matter jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1345, and
4
found to be proper. I.R.C. §§ 7402(b) and 7604(a) (26 U.S.C.) authorize the Government
5
to bring this action. The Order to Show Cause shifted the burden to Respondent of
6
rebutting any of the four (4) requirements of United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58
7
(1964).
8
9
10
11
This Court has reviewed the verified petition and the documents filed in support
thereof. On the summons enforcement merits, based on the uncontroverted verification of
the petition by Revenue Officer Ramos and the entire record, the Court finds as follows:
(1)
The summons issued to Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, by Revenue Officer
12
Lorena Ramos on August 5, 2011, seeking testimony and production of documents and
13
records in Respondent’s possession, was issued in good faith and for a legitimate purpose
14
under I.R.C. § 7602, that is, to secure payment of assessed income tax liabilities for
15
Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, for the tax years ending December 31, 2000,
16
December 31, 2001, December 31, 2003, December 31, 2004, December 31, 2005, and
17
December 31, 2006.
18
(2)
The information sought is relevant for that purpose.
19
(3)
The information sought is not already in the possession of the Internal
20
Revenue Service.
21
(4)
22
followed.
23
(5)
24
25
26
27
28
The administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code have been
There is no evidence of referral of this case by the Internal Revenue Service
to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.
(6)
The verified petition and its exhibits make a prima facie showing of
satisfaction of the requirements of United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964).
(7)
The burden shifted to Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, to rebut the prima
facie showing.
1
(8)
2
Respondent has presented no argument or evidence to rebut the prima facie
showing.
3
Therefore, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
4
(1)
The IRS summons issued to Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, be enforced;
5
(2)
Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, be ordered to appear at the I.R.S. offices at
6
2525 Capitol Street, Suite 206, Fresno, CA, 93721-2227, before Revenue Officer Lorena
7
Ramos, or her designated representative, on the twenty-first (21st) day after the filing date
8
of the District Judge's summons enforcement order, or at a later date to be set, in writing,
9
by Revenue Officer Ramos, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and to produce
10
for examining and copying the books, checks, records, papers, and other data demanded
11
by the summons, the examination to continue from day to day until completed; and,
(3)
12
13
If the Court enforces the summons, the Court shall retain jurisdiction to
enforce its order by its contempt power.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
14
15
Judge assigned to the case, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 304 of the
16
Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
17
Within ten (10) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any
18
party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a
19
document should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and
20
Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be filed and served within ten (10)
21
days after service of the objections. The District Judge will then review these findings
22
and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The parties are advised that
23
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the
24
District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
25
////
26
///
27
//
28
/
1
2
The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve Respondent, Kendall O. Bates, P.O. Box 25335,
Fresno, CA, 93729-5335.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
icido3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
July 24, 2012
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?