Roberts et al v. UBS AG et al

Filing 35

ORDER re Dismissal With Prejudice of Plaintiff's 4th Claim for Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/4/2013. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

NADIA ROBERTS, an individual, et al.

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
UBS AG, a foreign Swiss corporation, et al. )
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00724LJO-SKO
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH TH
PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ 4
CLAIM FOR RELIEF

24
25
26
27
28
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ 4 TH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

1

Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice

2

Plaintiffs’ 4th Claim for Relief In Second Amended Complaint which was included in

3

error following the Court’s order on UBS AG’s Motion to Dismiss.

4
5

Based on the Stipulation filed and for good cause appearing, the Court orders the
following:

6

1.

The 4th Claim for Relief is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
Dated:

11

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

March 4, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

12
13

66h44d

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFFS’ 4 TH CLAIM FOR RELIEF