Williams v. Cates et al
Filing
105
ORDER on Plaintiff's 99 Motion for Clarification of Change in Case Number and for Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/8/17. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
HORACE MANN WILLIAMS,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
v.
CATE, et al.,
9
Case No. 1:12-cv-00730-LJO-SKO (PC)
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION OF CHANGE IN CASE
NUMBER AND FOR SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. 99)
Defendants.
10
11
On July 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting clarification of any change in the case
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
number from “1:12-cv-00730 LJO DLB” to the current number listed above and requested an
updated scheduling order. (Doc. 99.) For Plaintiff’s clarification, the only change in the number
of this case is from “DLB” to “SKO.” “DLB” are the initials for Magistrate Judge Dennis L.
Beck, who is now retired. “SKO” are the initials for Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto who was
assigned this case when it was reopened on remand from the Ninth Circuit. A new Discovery and
Scheduling Order issued after remand on July 10, 2017. (Doc. 101.) This rendered Plaintiff’s
request for a new scheduling order moot.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff is requesting
20
21
22
23
clarification regarding the case number assigned to this action, the request is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s request for a new scheduling order is disregarded since moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
August 8, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?