Williams v. Cates et al

Filing 109

ORDER Adopting 104 Findings and Recommendation in Full and Denying Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief Based on Lack of Standing re 102 , 103 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/20/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

HORACE MANN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,

10

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION IN FULL AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF BASED ON LACK OF STANDING

v.

11
12

Case No. 1:12-cv-00730-LJO-SKO (PC)

CATE, et al.,
Defendants.

13

(Docs. 102, 103, 104)

14
15
Plaintiff, Horace Mann Williams is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

16
17
18

pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 9, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations which

19
20
21

were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that objections were to be
filed within twenty-one days. Neither side filed any objections. Local Rule 304(b), (d).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a

22
23
24

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the
Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1.

26

adopted in full; and

27
28

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on August 9, 2017 (Doc. 104), is

///
//
1

1

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief, filed on July 26, 2017 and August 7, 2017

2

(Docs. 102, 103) requesting access to his legal files and materials, are DENIED for

3

lack of standing.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

September 20, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2