Garcia v. Juarez
Filing
104
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 102 Motion for Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/29/2016. (Copies of 76-102 send to Plaintiff per this order) (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1:12-cv-00750-AWI-EPG (PC)
ROBERTO M. GARCIA, JR.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR DOCUMENTS
(ECF NO. 102)
Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW M. JUAREZ, JR. AND
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Roberto M. Garcia, Jr. (APlaintiff@) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
20
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On September 19, 2016,
21
Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a request for a copy of docketed documents. (ECF
22
No. 102). According to Plaintiff, it has been almost two months since he has received any
23
documents or notices from the Court.
24
Upon review of the docket, it appears that Plaintiff stopped being served with
25
documents once the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 76).
26
However, Plaintiff’s Counsel was only appointed for the limited purpose of (1) assisting
27
Plaintiff to bring a motion to compel responses and documents from the CDCR that the CDCR has
28
claimed are privileged; and (2) assisting Plaintiff with preparing for and participating in the August
1
Plaintiff’s Counsel was not obligated to assist with or
1
16, 2016 settlement conference.
2
participate in any other aspect of the case. Id. So, it appears that Plaintiff should never have
3
stopped receiving copies of the documents that were being filed in his case.
Id.
4
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a
5
copy of every document that has been filed in this case since May 25, 2016 (ECF Nos. 76-102).
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 29, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?