Garcia v. Juarez

Filing 155

ORDER VACATING Minutes Docket Entry 153 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/25/2017. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ROBERTO M. GARCIA, JR.,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

Case No. 1:12-cv-00750-AWI-EPG
ORDER VACATING MINUTES
DOCKET ENTRY
(Doc. 154)

MATTHEW M. JUAREZ, JR., et al.,

13
14

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

15
16
On April 24, 2017, the undersigned held a settlement conference in this matter. Following
17
this conference, minutes were entered on the docket for this case that state, in pertinent part, this
18
19
20
21

case was “not settled” (the “Minutes”). (Doc. 153.) On the same date, Defendant Juarez filed a
Request for Clarification Regarding Judge Oberto’s Minutes Concerning Settlement Conference
(the “Request”), in which Defendant Juarez states that the Minutes “might be misinterpreted to
suggest that the court was opining on whether or not an enforceable settlement agreement exists.”

22
(Doc. 154.)
23
The undersigned takes no position as to whether an enforceable settlement agreement
24

exists in this case. The undersigned also concurs with Defendant Juarez’s statement that the

25
Minutes may be interpreted as indicating that the undersigned holds a contrary position.
26
//
27
//
28

1

Accordingly, the undersigned VACATES the Minutes. (Doc. 153.)

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 Dated:
5

April 25, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.